Legal Opinion
Gardner v. PROCHNO
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 2012No. 50A03-1108-PL-385PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
The guardianship of Harold D. Gardner and Harold’s guardian, Scott A. Gardner, appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Carl Prochno. The designated evidence in this case shows that Prochno did not receive written notice to terminate his year-to-year tenancy to 240 acres of farm ground owned by Harold within three months of March 1, the generally accepted start date for farm leases. Because we conclude that Indiana Code chapter 32-31-1 requires written notice to terminate a year-to-year tenancy “not less than three (3) months before the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Filip v. BlockIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Merritt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Cold Storage v. The City of BoonvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- American Cold Storage v. The City of BoonvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Switzer Farms v. Sylvia Switzer, as Trustee of the Frank E. Switzer Revocable Trust (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015