Legal Opinion

Doe v. Patton

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided January 14, 2005No. 7:01-278-DCRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REEVES, District Judge.

This matter is pending for consideration of motions for summary judgment filed by Magoffin County and Paul Salyer [Record No. 112] and Lloyd Patton [Record No. 114]. The motions are in response to a suit brought by Jan Doe claiming that her Fourth and Eighth Amendment rights were violated when Patton allegedly raped her. She also claims that Magoffin County and Salyer were negligent in hiring and supervising Patton. Doe sues Patton and Salyer both in their individual and official capacities.

For the reasons discussed below, the Court will…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Synthes (U.S.A.)District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006
  2. Smith v. PeymanDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
  3. Doe v. University Of KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  4. Cole v. ShadoanDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
  5. Dier v. CITY OF PRESTONSBURG, KY.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API