Legal Opinion

Smith v. Peyman

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 18, 2015No. Civil Action No. 6: 14-084-DCRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge.

On April 7, 2014, Plaintiff William Smith filed this case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging the deprivation of his rights under the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, as well as related state claims. [Record No. 1] The matter is pending for consideration of Defendant Denny Peyman’s motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Record No. 30] For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion will be denied, in part, and granted, in part.

I

Thi…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boling v. Prospect Funding Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
  2. Ayers v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  3. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. LockardDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  4. Estep v. CombsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
  5. Massey v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API