Legal Opinion
Rosenblum v. Safeco Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 2005No. B172406PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
The plaintiff and appellant, Thelma K. Rosenblum, 1 asks us to reverse a summary judgment entered on her amended complaint in favor of the defendant and respondent, Safeco Insurance Company (Safeco). After negotiating a settlement of her claim and executing a full release upon the payment of the agreed amount by Safeco, Rosenblum filed this action alleging that she had entered into the settlement under duress and due to the fraudulent misrepresentations of Safeco. She further alleged that, in spite of such negotiated settlement, her claim had been revived by the passage of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Spray, Gould & Bowers v. Associated International InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Westlye v. Look Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Bialo v. Western Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Berger v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- DOHENY PARK TERRACE HOME-OWNERS ASS'N., INC. v. Truck Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- 1231 Euclid Homeowners Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- County of Los Angeles v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.