Legal Opinion
Brown v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 4, 1993No. 92-102LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HARKINS, Senior Judge:
At the close of argument, a bench ruling was made. The reasons for the ruling were stated upon the record.
Plaintiffs’ claim is for compensation for a Fifth Amendment taking of property on a recreational ranch by reason of “touch and go” operations at an Air Force auxiliary airfield (Wizard), which is located approximately 25 miles southeast of Laughlin Air Force Base, Del Rio, Texas. Wizard was designed specifically for “touch and go” training by pilots flying T-37 jet aircraft, a small two-seat, two-engine training jet; construction was completed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David M. Brown and Carolyn W. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Chevy Chase Land Co. of Montgomery County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Stearns Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Fairchild Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994