David M. Brown and Carolyn W. Brown v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the impact of noise from aircraft overflights, and arises under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. 1 In their complaint to the Court of Federal Claims, David and Carolyn Brown alleged that noise from low overflights by United States Air Force planes constituted a taking of their property, and that just compensation was due. The Government moved for summary judgment that, as a matter of law, the Browns could not recover. In addition to opposing the Government’s motion for summary judgment, the Browns argued that undisputed evidence showed that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Air Pegasus of d.c., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Brubaker Amusement Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.