Jacqueline Wilson v. Ford Motor Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Jacqueline Wilson claims that her employer Ford Motor Company violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Chapter 4112 of the Ohio Revised Code by failing to promote her because of her race. The district court granted Ford’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Wilson failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination. The court further held that, even assuming she had, there was no evidence that Ford’s reason for not promoting her was a pretext for racial discrimination. We agree with the rulings of the district court and therefore affirm.
I
J…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pram Nguyen v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shrivastava v. RBS Citizens Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Foltz v. UAWDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Local 894 Laborers' International Union of North America v. Kenny/Obayashi VDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Manning v. Lake Hospital System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Randolph v. Bath & Body Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.