Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Bath & Body Works, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 23, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00284Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DEVIN RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-284 vs. Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers BATH & BODY WORKS, INC., et al., Defendants. INITIAL SCREEN REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Devin Randolph, an Ohio resident proceeding here pro se, was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis by previous Order of the Court. (ECF No. 5.) This matter is now before the Undersigned to undertake the initial screen required by law to identify cognizable claims and to recommend dismissal of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API