Legal Opinion
Scureman v. Judge
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided October 5, 1999No. C.A. 1486-SPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBS, Vice Chancellor.
Because the Court has previously granted limited relief from a final judgment under Court of Chancery Rule 60(b), the issue again presented is whether t]ie southern portion of Lake Drive — a publicly dedicated right-of-way located in Rehoboth Beach, Sussex County, Delaware — is currently located above ground or under water. For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes, contrary to its original determination, that the disputed portion of Lake Drive is located under water,
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The issue arises in a somewhat unusual way. In its October, 1992…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Banks v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Perry v. ErlingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Feinman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Scureman v. JudgeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Severance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- White v. HartiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. KanagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. KanagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000