Legal Opinion

White v. Hartigan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 8, 2013PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

This case involves a dispute over property rights in a 1.7 mile beach parcel on the south shore of Martha’s Vineyard in Edgartown. Historically, two families — the Nortons (plaintiffs) and the Flynns (defendants)4 — have owned the property upland from the beach. For much of the past century, the two families enjoyed a friendly relationship and both families *402used the beach. That relationship deteriorated in the early 1980s, and a dispute arose as to title rights to the beach. In 2004, the Nortons commenced an action in the Land Court to quiet title, ultimately claiming that they owned a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Mulvey v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PariseauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Smaland Beach Association, Inc. v. GenovaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  3. Barnett v. MyerowMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  4. Brown v. KalickiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  5. Martha's Vineyard Land Bank Comm'n v. TaylorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API