Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gannett Co., Inc. v. Kanaga

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 3, 2000No. 352, 1998Published

1Dissent

CHANDLER, Chancellor,

dissenting.

A defendant in this case, Pamela Kane, was a patient of the plaintiff, Dr. Margo Kanaga. Dr. Kanaga located a small benign tumor in Kane and strongly recommended a hysterectomy, a surgical procedure requiring a hospital admission, to remove it. Dr. Kanaga’s office demanded a $500 advance payment before performing the procedure.

Before the hysterectomy was scheduled, Kane had an episode of heavy uterine bleeding and went to a hospital emergency room. The emergency room doctor, Dr. Domingo, removed the tumor by simply grasping it with a forceps and twisting it out…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Brittingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API