Gannett Co., Inc. v. Kanaga
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Dissent
CHANDLER, Chancellor,
dissenting.
A defendant in this case, Pamela Kane, was a patient of the plaintiff, Dr. Margo Kanaga. Dr. Kanaga located a small benign tumor in Kane and strongly recommended a hysterectomy, a surgical procedure requiring a hospital admission, to remove it. Dr. Kanaga’s office demanded a $500 advance payment before performing the procedure.
Before the hysterectomy was scheduled, Kane had an episode of heavy uterine bleeding and went to a hospital emergency room. The emergency room doctor, Dr. Domingo, removed the tumor by simply grasping it with a forceps and twisting it out…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Brittingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.