Legal Opinion

People v. Banks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1926No. Docket No. 128PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Defendant reviews his conviction on exceptions before sentence on a charge of practicing medicine without having a certificate of registration and license, as required by Act No. 237, Pub. Acts 1899, as amended, being sections 6724 et seq., 2 Comp. Laws 1915. The relevant sections of the statute appear in the margin. 1

No claim is made that the information does not charge an offense under the statute. The exceptions relate to:

“(1) Whether or not the acts proved make out the offense of practicing medicine without a license.
“(2) Failure to instruct the jury as to acts performed outside the venue.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Janssen v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Locke v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. People v. KenyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Powers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API