Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Katz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 3, 1969No. [No. 277, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In this case plaintiff-appellant (Davidson) thought he had acquired “something for nothing” and is upset because the trial court did not believe his witnesses.

More precisely, he contends he paid $1.00 for $200.00 plus 50% of an option contract calculated to produce a profit of 25 cents a foot for 270,000 square feet of ground ($67,500.00) along with an option worth an additional $43,683.00.

Defendant-appellee (Katz) in August of 1966 became an employee of a photocopy business owned by Davidson. He had previously been an employee of S.C.M. Corporation, the severance of which connection produced…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Snyder v. CearfossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Rinaudo v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Markoff v. KreinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  4. Freeman v. Stanbern Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Racine v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Resetar v. State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Pumphrey v. KehoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API