Legal Opinion

Pumphrey v. Kehoe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 13, 1971No. [No. 374, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

The question in this appeal is whether or not certain parol evidence was admissible to establish an alleged express assumption by three of the appellees, Holly Hill Associates, a limited partnership and Robert F. Koch and Daniel J. Kehoe, the limited partners, as purchasers of land under a written contract, dated July, 1964, with the owner, Daniel Tessitore, of an alleged obligation by Mr. Tessitore to pay an additional $6,600.00 to the appellants, Carolyn E. Pumphrey et al., sellers of the land to Mr. Tessitore, under a written contract of January 7,1963, in the event the land was rezoned to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rinaudo v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Markoff v. KreinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. Langel v. BetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Shoreham Developers, Inc. v. Randolph Hills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Eastover Stores, Inc. v. MinnixCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Hovnanian Land Investment Group, LLC v. Annapolis Towne Centre at Parole, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Homa v. Friendly Mobile Manor, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Delmarva Drilling Co. v. Tuckahoe Shopping Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API