Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Ferrari

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

34 Cal.App.2d Supp. 767 (1939)

HAZEL M. LEWIS, Appellant,

v.

AMBROSE FERRARI, Respondent.

California Court of Appeals.

May 16, 1939.

Davies, Wallace & Wallace for Appellant.

Fitzgerald & Selleck for Respondent.

Haines, P. J.

This is an appeal upon the judgment roll. The facts, as found by the municipal court, are, in brief, as follows:

From November 1, 1936, to October 2, 1938, the appellant, who is an adult woman, was employed by the respondent as an experienced retail clerk in a place of business operated by him at San Diego, California, known as "The Liquor House". She voluntarily worked therein…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Mason v. McLeodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  5. Wassermann v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  2. Pierce v. AnagnostakisUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Bartholomew v. Heyman Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API