Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Miller

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1983No. 8223DC975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be entered for a defendant only when the evidence in its most favorable light to the plaintiff fails to establish an essential element of the claim asserted. Potts v. Burnette, 301 N.C. 663, 273 S.E. 2d 285 (1981). The elements of intentional infliction of mental distress are (1) extreme and outrageous conduct, (2) which is intended to cause severe emotional distress, and (3) does cause severe emotional distress. Dickens v. Puryear, 302 N.C. 437, 276 S.E. 2d 325 (1981). The record contains plenary evidence as to each of these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Potts v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StuartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Briggs v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Brenda Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Burgess v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. English v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API