Legal Opinion

Mitsui Fudosan (U.S.A.), Inc. v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1990No. B043779PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GATES, J.

Between 1980 and 1982, Mitsui Fudosan (U.S.A.), Inc. (Mitsui), acquired three parcels of real property in downtown Los Angeles subject to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project of the City of Los Angeles. Although this plan limited the density of Mitsui’s planned development to a maximum floor area ratio of 6:1, i.e., 6 square feet of building area to 1 square foot of parcel area, it nevertheless permitted that level to be exceeded, subject to certain conditions, through the transfer of unused floor area ratios from other parcels within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Lynch v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. L. E. White Lumber Co. v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elk Hills Power v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. City of Irvine v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Village at Treehouse, Inc. v. Property Tax AdministratorColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Wilkinson v. St. Jude Harbors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Maguire/Thomas Ptnrs. Fifth & Grand v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API