Legal Opinion
United States v. Hendrickson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1931No. 430PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
A jury found that the appellee has been permanently and totally disabled, within the meaning of his policy of war risk insurance, since February 2, 1920. No complaint is made of that finding; the only question presented here is whether or not the controversy is one over which the courts have jurisdiction.
The appellee paid his premiums in cash until his discharge from the army in February, 1919. He was then suffering from a compensable disability, and the Veterans’ Bureau rated him as 50 per cent, disabled; such rating entitled him to $40 a month, which was several…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Meadows v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Runkle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Sprencel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. AlbertyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. KnottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. ValndzaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- United States ex rel. Lyons v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.