Legal Opinion

Sprencel v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1931No. 5913PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues upon a policy of war risk insurance in his favor for the sum of $10,-000, issued January 18, 1918. He alleges that $2,500 of this amount is admittedly in force, from which he has received monthly payments since May 14, 1925; that while at the front on October 15,1918, he was gassed and at the time of his discharge on July 3, 1919, was totally and permanently disabled, which matured the whole policy. In the alternative plaintiff alleges that if he was not so totally and permanently disabled, then he was at that time “suffering from a compensa-ble service…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Ballew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Maddox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Joy v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. United States v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. United States v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  4. Ridgell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. United States v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API