Legal Opinion
United States v. Golden
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1929No. 22PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
This is an action on a war risk insurance policy. The plaintiff claimed permanent and total disability dating from 1919. The government denied such claim and asserted that even so, the soldier had lost his right by converting his term policy into an ordinary life policy in 1926. The trial court found for the plaintiff, and this appeal results.
The whole ease is clouded by a mistake plaintiff labors under, a confusion of war risk insurance and compensation. It appears at length in his amended complaint, in the testimony, and apparently in the findings of the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Highway Comm. of Wyoming v. Utah Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hearne v. Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Runkle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- United States v. ClappCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- McNally v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Davies v. LahannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.