Legal Opinion

Meadows v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 14, 1930No. 269PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

Petitioner brought this action against the respondent in a federal district court to require the reinstatement of a lapsed insurance policy issued under the War Risk Insurance Act of October 6, 1917, c. 105, § 400, 40 Stat. 398, 409; amended August 9, 1921, c. 57, § 27, 42 Stat. 147, 156, 157. It was alleged that, being enlisted in the United States army during the World War, he applied for and obtained, under the act, a policy of insurance hi the sum of $10,000 against death and permanent and total disability. Thereafter, on February 1, 1920, $3,000 of this amohnt was converted into a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. DunkenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Almour v. Pace, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. United States v. FitchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API