Legal Opinion

State v. Stubbs

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 2010No. 81650-6PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

¶1 We granted Troy Dean Stubbs’s petition to review a decision of the Court of Appeals in which that court affirmed an exceptional sentence that the trial court imposed on Stubbs for first degree assault. In sentencing Stubbs, the trial court relied on a jury finding that the “victim’s injuries substantially exceed the level of bodily harm necessary to satisfy the elements of the offense.” Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 90. One of the elements, as set forth in the information charging Stubbs with first degree assault, was that Stubbs inflicted “great bodily harm” in the course of the assault, that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. RitchieWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. BatistaWashington Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. DuncalfWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. ChanthaboulyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 2018

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API