Legal Opinion

Imperial Colliery Co. v. Fout

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1988No. 17428PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice:

Danny H. Fout, the defendant below, appeals a summary judgment dismissing his claim of retaliatory eviction based on the provisions of W.Va.Code, Sü-SA-Síg), 1 which is our summary eviction statute. Imperial Colliery had instituted an eviction proceeding and Fout sought to defend against it, claiming that his eviction was in retaliation for his participation in a labor strike.

This case presents two issues: (1) whether a residential tenant who is sued for possession of rental property under W.Va. Code, 55-3A-1, et seq., may assert retaliation by the landlord as a defense, and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Murphy v. SmallridgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State Ex Rel. Anstey v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Espenschied v. MallickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Adams v. GaylockWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API