Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Huston v. Big Bend Land Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1918No. Nos. 14633, 13502PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Application .filed in the supreme court January 15, 1918, for a writ of mandamus to compel the superior court for Lincoln county, Sessions, J., to make and enter a judgment and order requested by relators; and motion filed in the supreme court December 18,1917, to recall the remittitur, in an action of unlawful detainer.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This proceeding arises out of the case of the Big Bend Land Co. v. Huston, 98 Wash. 640, 168 Pac. 470. When the remittitur went down, counsel for defendants Huston moved the court:
“. . . for judgment dismissing said action and proceeding, for the costs and disbursements of relators *426herein, and for an order directing the issuance by the clerk of said court, under the seal thereof, of a writ of restitution directed to the sheriff of Lincoln county, commanding him. to restore to relators the possession of the lands and premises hereinbefore described, the possession of which was taken from them…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mail Co. v. FlandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- King v. PooleNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Big Bend Land Co. v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Titlow v. Cascade Oatmeal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Burke v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Huston v. Big Bend Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Huston v. Big Bend Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924