Legal Opinion

Lees v. Wardall

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 27, 1976No. 3433-1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andersen, J.—

Facts of Case

This appeal is brought by tenants from an order dismissing their forcible entry action against a former landlord.

The cáse was tried to the court. The trial court’s findings of fact are not controverted and are, therefore, the law of this case. They establish the following.

The Lees family (hereinafter the tenants) occupied a house belonging to Georgia L. Wardall (hereinafter the landlord) on a month-to-month tenancy.

The tenants started to move out but before they left, the landlord, for some reason not clarified by the sparse record before us, removed the door and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fisher v. World-Wide Trophy OutfittersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. Young v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Little v. CataniaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Tuschoff v. WestoverWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Kessler v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cummins Management, L.P. v. GilroyNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mead v. Park Place PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Colonial Tri-City Ltd. Partnership v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Peterson v. Cascade Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Holliday Land & Livestock Co. v. PierceMontana Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API