Legal Opinion

HOUSTON FIRE AND CAUSALTY INSURANCE CO. v. Kahn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1962No. A-9002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEAKLEY, Justice.

The only problem of the case is the proper construction of the medical coverage clause of a policy of insurance issued by Petitioner covering Respondent and members of his family. The coverage is for medical expenses resulting from bodily injury “caused by accident * * * through being struck by an automobile.”

The facts were stipulated. The son of Respondent while riding a bicycle ran into the rear of an unoccupied and legally parked automobile on a public street in Houston, and sustained bodily injuries. Respondent recovered judgment against Petitioner in the sum of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davilla v. Liberty Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Hale v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. CutshallTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Carson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceClark County Court of Common Pleas · 1960
  5. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gallup v. St. Paul Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ferguson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. DeBerry v. American Motorists InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  5. Rosebrooks v. National General InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API