HOUSTON FIRE AND CAUSALTY INSURANCE CO. v. Kahn
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEAKLEY, Justice.
The only problem of the case is the proper construction of the medical coverage clause of a policy of insurance issued by Petitioner covering Respondent and members of his family. The coverage is for medical expenses resulting from bodily injury “caused by accident * * * through being struck by an automobile.”
The facts were stipulated. The son of Respondent while riding a bicycle ran into the rear of an unoccupied and legally parked automobile on a public street in Houston, and sustained bodily injuries. Respondent recovered judgment against Petitioner in the sum of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davilla v. Liberty Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Hale v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. CutshallTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Carson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceClark County Court of Common Pleas · 1960
- Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gallup v. St. Paul Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Ferguson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- DeBerry v. American Motorists InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Rosebrooks v. National General InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.