Ferguson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff sued defendant Insurance Companies upon the “medical payments provision” of policies issued upon her automobile (and sued defendant Insurance Agency upon policy which was requested but not issued). Such policies provide medical payments for the named insured who sustains “bodily injury, caused by accident, while occupying or through being struck by an automobile” The term “occupying” is defined in the policy as meaning “in or upon or entering into or alighting from an automobile."
Plaintiff had been to the beauty parlor. She left the beauty parlor, came out…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- HOUSTON FIRE AND CAUSALTY INSURANCE CO. v. KahnTexas Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by17 opinions
- Michigan Mutual Insurance Co. v. CombsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fulton v. Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Stoddard v. "Aid" InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- McDonald v. Southern County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.