Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Robertson

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 21, 1931No. 1441PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.

This is a suit brought under section 4915, Revised Statutes (35 USCA § 63), whereby plaintiff seeks to establish his light to require the Patent Office to issue to him a patent on an alleged invention having to do with high-speed hydraulic turbines, and, more specifically, as defined in plaintiff’s claim, with “a runner wheel for high speed water turbines provided with guide vanes, said wheel comprising a plurality of angularly adjustable blades, and means to adjust said blades while the wheel is running so as to vary not only the outlet angles and passages…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Hubbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  2. Nichols v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  3. Freeman v. Premier Mach. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935
  4. Rendleman v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API