George E. Warren Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant George E. Warren Corporation (“Warren”) appeals the decision of the United States Court of International Trade granting summary judgment to the government in this civil action contesting the denial of Warren’s protest. The court held that Harbor Maintenance Taxes (“HMTs”) and Environmental Taxes (“ETs”) paid by Warren on various imported petroleum products were ineligible for drawback refunds. George E. Warren Corp. v. United States, 201 F.Supp.2d 1366 (Ct. Int’l 2002). Despite the government’s argument about prematurity and failure to exhaust…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Van Wersch v. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Texport Oil Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Company and Salah El Din Ahmed Mohammed Idris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Florida Power & Light Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- George E. Warren Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.