Legal Opinion

Ace Constructors, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 19, 2007No. 2006-5093PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ACE Constructors, Inc. entered into a contract with the United States Army Corps of Engineers to build a structure designated the Ammo Hot-Load Facility, at Biggs Army Airfield at Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas. Several disputes arose and, after a five-day trial, the Court of Federal Claims decided several issues in favor of ACE, awarded an equitable adjustment to ACE in the amount of $1,383,009 with statutory interest, and ordered the return of liquidated delay damages in the amount of $246,130. 1 On this appeal by the United States, we affirm the judgment of the Court of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Scott Timber Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Eastern Electric Corp. v. Shoemaker Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Redland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API