Legal Opinion

Heimer v. Yates

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1919No. 39-2693PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSONFIEtLD, P. J.

Plaintiff, Louisa C. Heimer, instituted this suit against Roy Neb-lett, C. D. Neff, Mrs. C. IL, Marrett, and J. P. Tates to recover the title and possession of a tract of land in the city of Ft. Worth and to declare null and void deeds executed by plaintiff to C. D. Neff, by C. D. Neff to Mrs. C. H. Marrett, and by Mrs. Marrett to J. P. Tates, respectively, conveying the property. Plaintiff alleged a conspiracy on the part of the defendants to defraud her; that she was induced to part with her property by fraudulent representations, threats, and force made and used by defendants.. The case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. StrycharskiTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Fant v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Henne & Meyer v. MoultrieTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Neff v. HeimerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gulf Refining Co. v. BoninCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Bell v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. White v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Yardley v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Carter v. PortwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API