Muhammad v. Garrett
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff claims he suffered excessive force during an arrest. In the current motion, Defendants argue they are entitled to a grant of summary judgment because Plaintiffs entire complaint is barred. (Doc. 95) The evidence demonstrates that Plaintiff has suffered convictions of crimes that, if he was successful in the current action, would be undermined. Because he is not permitted to pursue this action without first demonstrating the criminal convictions have been set…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- (PC) Singanonh v. FineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Alexander v. DiazDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Bethany Farber v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Duarte v. Stockton CityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Rodrick Gant v. Kendall Beckley, Andrew OgradyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025