Legal Opinion

Rodrick Gant v. Kendall Beckley, Andrew Ogrady

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 7, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01108Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Rodrick Gant, Case No. 2:25-cv-01108-ART-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. and 8 Report and Recommendation Kendall Beckley, Andrew Ogrady, 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff Rodrick Gant is proceeding in this action pro se and has filed a renewed request 12 for authority to proceed in forma pauperis (meaning, without paying the filing fee) under 28 13 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff also submitted an amended complaint, attached to his 14 renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 5-1). Because the Court finds that 15…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API