Legal Opinion

(PC) Singanonh v. Fine

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 6, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01824Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIENGKHAM SINGANONH, No. 2:18-cv-1824 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 R. FINE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 The case is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 33, and plaintiff’s motion 19 to amend the complaint, ECF No. 38. 20 I. Procedural History 21 This case proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint. ECF No. 14. On screening, 22 plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API