BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE UNITED WITH THE MILLION MOM MARCH v. Ashcroft
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the government’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment on the question of subject-matter jurisdiction. In its motion, the government argues that the plaintiffs challenge, under §§ 921-23 of the Gun Control Act, to certain procedures of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (the “ATF”) fails to constitute a justiciable controversy under Article III because the plaintiff fails to show that it has the requisite standing to bring this action. Additionally, the government contends that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Speelman v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Koch v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Dye v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Hunter v. RiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Lopez v. Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.