Legal Opinion
In Re the Discipline of Ennenga
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 2001No. 20000476PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Chief Justice.
INTRODUCTION
T1 The Office of Professional Conduct (OPC) of the Utah State Bar appeals from a judgment of the district court suspending attorney Peter M. Ennega from the practice of law for six months and placing him on probation for three years for violating rules 14, 1.15, 8.1, 8.1(b), 8.4(b), and 8.4(c) of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct. Ennen-ga cross-appeals, asserting that the trial court's sanction order was erroneous because it violated the constitutional prohibition against the application of ex post facto laws in the context of criminal punishments.
BACKGROU…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. NortonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Braverman v. Bar Assn. of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Norfolk & Portsmouth Bar Ass'n v. DrewrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Discipline of Alvin LundgrenUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re the Discipline of CoreyUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- In re the Discipline of CrawleyUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- In re of the Discipline of GrimesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Discipline of DoncouseUtah Supreme Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.