Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The defendant Upham & Russell Company, is a Wisconsin corporation, and on August 1, 1932, made a common-law assignment for the benefit of creditors, and in the usual form assigned the property of the corporation to the plaintiff as assignee. The assignment recites that the assignor has bargained, sold, and conveyed to the assignee all right, title, and interest in the property of the assignor, save only that exempt from levy and sale on execution, in trust, however, to take possession of the property, sell and convert the same into money, collect and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Toy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Leigh Aitchison, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Columbia Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Werner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duvick v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. St. Mary's Congregation v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Phaneuf v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Duvick v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API