Legal Opinion

Columbia Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1929PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

Liability under the workmen’s compensation act exists against an employer for any accidental injury sustained by an employee where at the time of the accident the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment. Sec. 102.03, Stats. Batranek, if he was an employee, was injured while performing such service. The sole question is, Was he an employee? The facts are not in dispute, and whether he was an employee is a matter of law.

The appellant contends that under the rule of Leigh Aitchison, Inc. v. Industrial Comm. 188 Wis. 218, 205 N. W. 806, Batranek was not an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leigh Aitchison, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Toy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Parker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Stevens v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Corcoran v. PG Corcoran Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Fish v. White Equipment Sales & Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API