Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC v. Barr Laboratories
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, Senior District Judge.
I
This case involves the issue of whether a patent on a pharmaceutical product can be sustained where information containing test results on a given species of animals contrary to the results intended to occur in humans, was deliberately withheld from the patent examiner, and was not reflected in the patent as issued. This opinion contains my findings of fact and conclusions of law, some of which are summarized or elaborated in the appendix. I find the existence of all the facts set forth by clear and convincing evidence. This court has…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Pharmachemie B.V. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HenneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- In Re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.