Legal Opinion

Curry v. Texas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 1928No. 386Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

GROSS, Special Chief Justice. Appellees the Texas Company and Bateman, Scott, and York have filed motions- for rehearing vigorously protesting this court’s holding that the contract is ambiguous, and that the pleadings are sufficient to show such ambiguity and to entitle plaintiff to explain the same by parol, and to prove a practical construction by the parties consistent with his theory. Where the original opinion is adhered to it is unusual, on rehearing, to write on the. questions discussed therein, but the earnestness of the argument of appellees moves u's to discuss again…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Buzar v. First National Bank of GreenvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Faulkner v. ReedTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Baker v. ShafterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API