Intertape Polymer Corp. v. Inspired Technologies, Inc.

ORDER

GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court without oral argument upon consideration of Plaintiff-Counterdefendant’s, Intertape Polymer Corporation (“Intertape”), Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) (Doc. 43), 1 Defendant-Counterclaimant’s, Inspired Technologies, Inc. (“ITI”), response in opposition thereto (Doc. 63) (the “Response”), and Intertape’s reply (Doc. 66).

1. Overview

The procedural history and general background of this case have been summarized in prior orders. (Docs. 29 and 71). In its instant Motion, Intertape contends that it is entitled to…