Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Millennium Laboratories, Ine.’s (“Millennium”) Motion to Dismiss Counts I, VI, and VII of Plaintiff Ameritox, Ltd.’s (“Ameritox”) Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 101). Ameritox filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 118) to Millennium’s motion.
On August 9, 2012, the Court directed Ameritox to file a supplemental brief that addressed, with citations to authority: “(1) whether a Lanham Act claim based on advertisements implicitly representing that the practices being promoted are legal, when in actuality…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Incarcerated Entertainment, LLC v. Warner Bros. PicturesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- ICON Health & Fitness Inc v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Innospec Inc. and Innospec Fuel Specialties LLC v. Aurorium Holdings LLC, Aurorium Denham Springs LLC and Aurorium LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Molson Coors Beverage Company USA, LLC v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019