Legal Opinion
Brandt Corp. v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1964PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
On July 30, 1953, the City of New York, acting through the New York City Transit Authority, arranged to have plaintiff contracting company perform work in connection with the heating, ventilating and airconditioning of the 74th Street Power Plant in Manhattan for which the city agreed to pay $349,000. Plaintiff contractor contends that, during the course of the work, the city required it to perform some extras for which it seeks to recover $18,867.99. The plaintiff also maintains that the city withheld from the contract price $3,081.68 for the contractor’s alleged failure to remove rubbish…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oakhill Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Fredburn Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Cauldwell-Wingate Company v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- MacArthur Bros. Company v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- MacArthur Bros. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ferran Concrete Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Mon-Rite Construction Co. v. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fosco Fabricators, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Eastern Rock Products, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1981
- Conway v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.