Legal Opinion

Fredburn Construction Corp. v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that upon the motion made by defendant for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, a substantial question of fact was presented which entitled the plaintiff to a trial of the issue as to whether the so-called last payment voucher was intended and understood to be a last payment voucher and whether plaintiff was barred by accepting the so-called last payment from recovering any further payments from the defendant.

The judgments should be reversed and the motion denied, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Lehman, Httbbs, Loughban, Finch…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nicholas Di Menna & Sons, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Buffalo Electric Co. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Brandt Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Fattore Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Sewerage Commission of the County of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. Ferran Concrete Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API