MacArthur Bros. Company v. . the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment entered May 14, 1917, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, overruling plaintiffs’ exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment in favor of defendant upon the verdict directed by the trial court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment entered May 14, 1917, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, overruling plaintiffs’ exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment in favor of defendant upon the verdict directed by the trial court. The plaintiffs contracted with the city of New York through the aqueduct commissioners to construct the Cross river reservoir in Westchester county. They proceeded with their work, and payments were made upon the…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Pound and Crane, JJ. Dissenting as to seventh cause of action: Cardozo and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Oakhill Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Brandt Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Oscar Daniels Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Cauldwell-Wingate Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Buffalo Electric Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.