Legal Opinion
Mon-Rite Construction Co. v. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 9, 1984No. 47681PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParrino, P.J.
Plaintiff, Mon-Rite Construction Company (“Mon-Rite”), appeals from the trial court’s granting of defendant Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District’s (“Sewer District”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons adduced below, we hold that summary judgment was properly granted.
I
This action arises out of a contract between Mon-Rite and the Sewer District known as “Cuyahoga Valley Interceptor Contract No. F-6, Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District Contract No. 670.” The contract was for the construction of the Northfield and Haw-thornden Trunks of the Cuyahoga Valley Interceptor Sewer.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Oakhill Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Brandt Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re: Graham Square, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Wurth v. Ideal Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Beasley v. Monoko, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Village Station Associates v. Geauga Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.