Legal Opinion

Moss v. Associated Transport, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1965No. 15634PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.

The question for decision is whether in the jury trial of four consolidated diversity actions involving conflicting claims for death, personal injury and property damage arising out of a highway collision between two tractor-trailer combinations, the District Judge committed reversible error in separating the issues of liability for trial prior to the issues of damages. Separation of issues is authorized by Rule 42(b) F.R.Civ.P. which provides that “[t]he court in furtherance of convenience * * * may order a separate trial of * * * any separate issue or of any number…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio v. May Spach, as Receiver for Ro-Ben, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  5. Bowie v. SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re Bendectin Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. James Hirst v. Jean GertzenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. In Re Beverly Hills Fire LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,925 Arthur Young & Company v. United States District Court, Etc., Albert Kaufman, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API