Legal Opinion
Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 21, 2000No. Civ. 97-2298(RLE)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the consent of the parties, as authorized by Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), upon the parties’ Motions in limine. Deeming oral argument to be unnecessary, we have considered these Motions on the parties’ written submissions. For reasons which follow, we deny the Motion of the Plaintiff Transclean Corporation (“Tran-sclean”) to Exclude Evidence of Inequitable Conduct, to Exclude Sample Machines and Photographs, to Exclude Evidence Based upon the Summary…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- North Star Mutual Insurance v. Zurich InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Sancom, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2010
- Maria Amplatz v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Duluth Lighthouse for the Blind v. C.G. Bretting Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.