Legal Opinion
In Re Murillo
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 17, 2006No. 24444-0-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
142 P.3d 615 (2006)
In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of Ramon Flores MURILLO, Petitioner.
No. 24444-0-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
August 17, 2006.
David Zuckerman, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Teresa Jeanne Chen, Grant County Prosecutors Office, John Dietrich Knodell III, Attorney at Law, Ephrata, WA, for Respondent.
OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART
SWEENEY, C.J.
¶ 1 RCW 9.94A.712 requires that a judge sentence a defendant convicted of first degree child molestation to the statutory maximumlife imprisonment. The sentencing court sets only a minimum term,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Shawn Benjamin SherrodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State of Washington v. Jose Fidel MandujanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015