Hollander v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The appeal in these cases relate to a final decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder. His reasons for 4he entry thereof appear in the record in the case. We have carefully examined them and the briefs of counsel. We can only conclude that his findings of fact are supported by the proofs and that the conclusions of law find support in the well reasoned opinions cited by him.
The decree will be affirmed, with costs.
No. 216 with No. 217' — •
Bor affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
For…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Roach v. MarguliesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Bookman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
- Essential Enterprises Corp. v. Dorsey Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
- Hollander v. MascuchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- Kelley v. AxelssonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997